The Subtle Difference Created by Countless Repetitions: "We Built this City" - K-ARTNOW
Park Chanmin (b.1970) Seoul, Korea

Park Chanmim graduated from Korea University’s Department of German Literature (1997) and obtained a master’s degree from Chung-Ang University’s Graduate School of Photography (2008). After that, he graduated from the University of Edinburgh, UK with a Master’s degree in Contemporary Art (2011).

Solo Exhibitions (Brief)

From the beginning of his work to the present, he has been steadily taking photos of urban spaces and living environments. In 2008, Gallery Lux (Seoul, Korea) was selected for a young artist support contest and held his first solo exhibition.

After studying in the UK, he returned to Korea and exhibited at Makeshop Art Space (Paju, Korea) and Gallery On (Seoul, Korea) in 2013, and held an exhibition to commemorate the award of the ILWOO Photography Award at ILWOO Space (Seoul, Korea) in 2015. So far (2022), he has held nine solo exhibitions, and most recently, he presented the exhibition 《We Built This City》 at Gallery Jinun (Seoul, Korea) in 2021.

Group Exhibitions (Brief)

Participated in group exhibitions held at Korean Cultural Center Gallery (Ottawa, Canada), Daegu Arts Center (Daegu, Korea), Seoul Museum of Art (Seoul, Korea), Space K (Daegu, Korea), Seoul Museum of History (Seoul, Korea), Korean Cultural Center UK (London, UK), Dong-gang Museum of Photography (Yeongwol, Korea).

Awards (Selected)

He was selected as the 1st SKOPF (KT&G Sangsangmadang Korean Photographer’s Fellowship, Korea) and won the 6th ILWOO Photography Award exhibition section (ILWOO Foundation, Korea).

Collections (Selected)

His works are in collections of various museums and foundations such as The National Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art(Gwacheon, Korea), ILWOO Foundation, Daegu Museum of Art(Daegu, Korea), Goeun Museum of Photography, (Busan, Korea), Seoul Museum of Art(Seoul, Korea), The Sovereig Art Foundation (Hong Kong).

Originality & Identity

‘Observing’ is an attempt to look into the whole, not into details. It is easy to discover a schematic structure by applying a high-level view. The photography of Park Chanmin explores the structure of urban areas and captures the life essence of the city people.

“In all cities, individuals can only discover the difference in their life by knowing what space is built in the city.”

Park Chanmin’s various photographic series are somewhat different in material and form. He completes his work through post-finishing using graphic programs by inserting city building images on the screen. In this process, the artist removes certain elements in the image, such as the name of apartment buildings or the windows on the exterior walls. It is the artist’s underlying assumption behind his works, delivering his awareness of problems through a strategy of contextualising the photographed photos by erasing some of the spatial information.

The landscape of the entire city shows the overall impression as compressed visuals such as the structure of the city and the collaborative life of the city people. As the reality of nature and the city is left behind, it still looks somewhat realistic. However, the audience can easily find the traces and areas of tampering applied by the artist. Naturally, the audience actively understands the interpretation of the work by observing what the artist has erased and what remains without erasing.

Park Chanmin reveals the structure of the desire underlying modern society in his photographs. His photographs visualize the universal essence of urban space while carefully evoking awareness of standardized urban life. His photographs visualise the universal essence of urban space. At the same time, the artist tries to elicit different interpretations of the city by maintaining a neutral perspective throughout the work.

Style & Contents

The artist Park Chanmin is interested in Korea’s housing culture and its artifacts and social issues. These impressions come from his childhood experience of moving from a spacious apartment to a small multi-family living apartment. His first series of residential spaces, ‘Intimate City’(2007~2009), looked at a city landscape lined with apartments in a haze from a high location. The similar image of apartments that erased the name of the building or traces, creates a uniform appearance of the city in his works.

Afterwards, the artist studied abroad in Edinburgh, where he studied apartment houses in Scotland compared to Korea. In his series named ‘Blocks’(2010~ ), the vertical surface of the exterior of the building begins to be erased from the work. The artist removes the windows and balconies of the apartment building and turned it into a surreal appearance that was completely blocked off. A building, where no sound leaks out and no outside sounds can be heard from inside, becomes an anonymous space not different from a warehouse or container. It becomes a dead space where no communication exists.

Meanwhile, in his series work, ‘Untitled; The Level of Deception’(2012~2014), the artist raises the questions about the perception of urban space in which context has been removed through photographs of European cities with the background erased. The photography series named ‘Urbanscape; surrounded by Space’(2012~ ) creates a geometric landscape with the facades of buildings that are approaching each other closely. The simpler the surface of the building, the more difficult it is to feel the breathing and the sense of life of the people living in the building.

The perspective of Park Chanmin, looking at the place of modern people’s life, gradually expands from the apartment to the entire city space. ‘Citis’(2015~ ) is a series of photos looking down on major Asian cities including Seoul. A photograph of a city lined with abstract buildings like toy models is somewhat heterogeneous. He simplified the facades of buildings with flat, achromatic colour surfaces, emphasizing the lines and surfaces composing the space.

In front of Park Chanmin’s work, the audience discovers the universal image of a city easily found in any country in modern societies, along with the urban structure of cities like Seoul, with its vertically dense high-rise buildings. Also, the entire anonymized city, rather than a building, is faced with a structure that has lost its function as if it had become muted.

Constancy & Continuity

Although the spatial feature has been erased, the audience will be able to quickly recognize the place photographed by Park Chanmin through the terrain and impressions. The skyline buildings and the flow of streamline and roads are his own art materials. However, to appreciate his work, it is not so important to know where it is or to learn information about each city.

Park Chanmin captures various architectures and various cities in his works, but the purpose of his art is not to show their special typological differences. The city that he sees is a homogeneous space, with only differences in its geographical name and minor details. Modern cities dominated by the floor area ratio (FAR) and economic feasibility have standardized and mass-produced even the appearance of people’s life.

In his work, to express the essence of a city, the neutrally filmed image is modulated in post-production. Unlike the method of capturing the scene of an event with historical significance or directing a specific scene, it suggests a new context by using a more pictorial language.

In his photographs, the city is visualized in an abstract form. There are similar stylized abstract paintings that repeat basic characteristics by changing only the composition little by little. The artist’s work that utilizes photography as a ‘tool of expression that is based on reality but connects and expands reality’ shows a new type of modern photography. What will the city of tomorrow create and what will future photographs of Park Chanmin look like?

The Subtle Difference Created by Countless Repetitions: "We Built this City"
Sung Hong KIM, MArch, PhD (Professor of Architecture & Urbanism, UNIVERSITY OF SEOUL)

Before overseas travel was completely liberalized in 1989, the only way for students to experience architecture around the world had been through texts and black-and-white photography. Color photobooks published by some travelers traveling overseas were the best way to view sceneries of foreign cities. At that time, young professors who returned from studying abroad showed works of master architects and these made my heart race. Slide files in a bookshelf of a professor's lab meant academic authority. In the 1990s, architects formed groups and went abroad to explore architecture. Heavy cameras were hung over their shoulders, and their backpack contained dozens or hundreds of slide films.
 
It has been more than 30 years since then, and only a few architects are taking their cameras out at their new destinations. The architects take a snapshot with smartphones and that is it. I have seen thousands of unscanned images being thrown into a trash can as slide files in the lab of a senior professor who is close to retirement. The same happens both domestically and internationally. Owning images, whether slides or digital files, no longer signifies authority. A huge number of images is circulated on the Internet. A webzine containing new drawings and images created in Africa and South America is delivered daily through smartphones. As long as we don't decide to block, images and information surround our daily lives.
 
I study cities and architecture using drawings, historical records, and statistics. However, we can immediately approach the reality of a city through a photograph captured intuitively rather than an analytical research. Therefore, we send emails, make phone calls, and do the legwork to find pictures for books amidst the flood of images. This is not only about before the copyright problem, but because we require a picture which projects in a visual form the world of feelings we cannot describe with words and numbers. We have come to the digital age after the ‘age of technological reproduction’ of the early 20th century, but ‘uniqueness’ of photography and the ‘aura’ of an artist are still alive.
 
Chanmin Park's new exhibition ‘We Built This City (2021)’ is a work of cities following ‘Intimate City (2008),’ ‘Untitled (2013),’ ‘Urbanscape: Surrounded by Space (2015),’ and ‘Blocks (2015).’ Chanmin Park's photograph, seen through the eyes of an architect, is the middle view of a city where nature has stepped back. To exclude the three-point perspective effect as much as possible, the midpoint between the city surface looking up and the bird's eye view looking down is taken as the vanishing point of the camera. The time of day is around noon when long shadows, sharp contrasts, and diffused light are not present. It is an expressionless urban landscape captured with a telephoto lens, excluding spectacles, dramatic atmospheres, events, and fleeting scenes. The building, where the details of the surface have been removed, remains as a heavy mass. It is like looking at a surreal urban space at noon as if people have been erased from an Edward Hopper's painting.
 
Chanmin Park expresses this as ‘neutrality of emotions or values’ underneath modern art. The meaning of painting, sculptures, and architecture prior to modernism is not a figure or form itself, but something that they are trying to convey. Modern projects have overturned the relationship between signified and signifier. Art does not represent something outside of art. There only exist constitutive logic, order, and law of figures and forms. The value of an artwork lies not in a medium through which it is communicated, but in itself. However, this does not mean artworks do not represent intentions, meanings, or representations. It means that one narrative structure and one interpretation planted by a creator cannot be established. The one-sided relationship between the subject and the object is turned into a multi-layered and reciprocal relationship.
 
However, abstruse theories and knowledge are not prerequisites for us who are standing in front of the work to acquire. We do not exclaim after analyzing and interpreting. Our reaction is intuitive and simultaneous. This is because we first communicate in the world of feelings before the world of logic. Even if it cannot be disassembled and analyzed, there is something in Chanmin Park's photograph that fixes the gaze and moves the heart. It is the neutral beauty that remains after unnecessary things are removed.
 
If you take a close look at the photo book ‘Blocks (2015),’ you can see at a glance that it is a small British town with high latitude where the sun is not scorching and the humidity is high. The reasons are the color of the sky, the surfaces of the buildings and roads, the gloomy nature, and the street corner scenery with few people. On the other hand, it is difficult to tell whether the forest of skyscrapers in ‘Urbanscape: Surrounded by Space (2015)’ is in Hong Kong, Tokyo, or Seoul. The photos with the windows and doors removed are even more difficult to tell.
 
It is ironic that Asian cities are more modern than the country which has spread modernism around the world over the past 100 years. For Chanmin Park, who studied photography in Seoul and Edinburgh, similarities and subtle differences in Asian cities would have been a more realistic topic than 'oriental fantasy.' The high-rise building masses and silhouettes of the three cities in East Asia revealed in his photos are surprisingly similar. This means there are only differences in details such as wall tiles, letters, outdoor units of air conditioners, and stair railings. This also means that the real difference between East Asian cities lies in the small details, not in the grand and showy landmarks or icons. His photos show that Seoul cannot and does not have to be a European city.
 
A few photos, drawings, and books can make you a star, but they are not called as artists. The artists are those people who endure boring and endless repetition. In the film about the author of ‘The Catcher in the Rye,’ the teacher asks a young aspirant, “Getting used to being rejected for publication is the first step of an author. Would you still write if you could not publish in your lifetime?” It is such a brutal question. Writing, drawing, and taking pictures are to empathize with someone. But it also has to survive as a profession. an author's There is a fine, paper-thin line between the desire for 'empathy' and the struggle for 'survival,' but completely different worlds unfold on the front and back of paper. The film drags both worlds to the last scene.
 
Now that YouTube views and Instagram sensibility are overwhelming, the life of a photographer who distances himself from commercial photography and documentary is lonely and precarious. Still, to the question of what drives him to do preliminary research in the studio every day and go out on the street with his camera, He answered, "I don't think about it." Artisans who make their livings by tediously repetitive work do not think with their heads. I believe that the weight and depth are created when the trajectory and work of a human, who has lived fiercely while enduring what has been given, form a single narrative. Chanmin Park's city work for over ten years must have been a tedious and repetitive route to create his own narrative as well.
 
The new pieces presented in this exhibition ‘We Built this City’ show that his perspective on the cities has become bolder and more intimate. While the subject is narrowed down to our cities in East Asia, the works are looking at the cities from above and the distance. The urban landscapes encompassing buildings, mountains, seas, rivers, roads, bridges, overpasses, and landscapes, are revealed more clearly. The modern cities are collections of desire, competition, conflict, and compromise. Chanmin Park is dissecting them more deeply and sharply.

References

Articles

Editor’s Picks